Power dependencies vary depending on whether networks regulate energy or telecommunications markets Governance today often surpasses national borders. Regulatory networks and their Network Administrative Organizations (NAOs) come into play when policies can neither be solely covered by national governments nor delegated to European institutions. These regulatory networks cover specific legislation 'gaps' and their mission is to coordinate and reach consensus among the different countries involved. Angel Saz-Carranza, Director of ESADEgeo and Associate Professor of Strategy, and his research colleagues took an in-depth look at how these networks are organized in the latest issue of Public Administration Review. Their research findings illustrate the power struggles that these regulatory networks face and explain why some are more vulnerable to external influences than others. The team conducted in-depth interviews with managers and directors of Network Administrative Organizations, European Commission officials and other key staff from national regulatory authorities. The report compared how these networks are structured and how their power dependencies increase or decrease based on whether they address energy or telecommunications matters. In some of these networks, participation as a member is optional, whereas in others is mandatory. "A main finding of our research is that networks that are not voluntary and require mandatory participation by European regulations are far from conflict-free," says Saz-Carranza. "In mandatory networks, we observed that political tension increases and members struggle to try to exert an influence on the inception and development of the network." Bargaining power and most contested issues How does bargaining power affect the development of mandated regulatory networks? "Our results suggest that the inception, design and development of mandated networks are affected by the power dynamics between 1) network members, 2) network members and key stakeholders in their domestic policy regime, and 3) the whole network and its domain." The study also takes a close look at the key issues that members contest most strongly during the initial definition and inception stages of mandated networks. "We found that the most disputed issues are the network's executive control, the network's size, and the network-level tasks and overall responsibilities." Network vulnerability Why are some networks more vulnerable to external influences than others? The Director of ESADEgeo and his research team argue that the degree of the network's external dependence varies depending on whether it operates in the energy or telecom sector. "Energy is potentially a more sensitive issue than telecoms, so it tends to have more political interferences," explains Saz-Carranza. "Unlike their telecom counterparts, we found that energy networks are more integrated precisely because their members are more vulnerable to political interference from governments and large energy companies." According to the report, this greater dependency on third parties may be attributable to Europe's energy dependence or - as one interviewee put it bluntly - the 'Russia factor', referring to Europe's dependence on a few foreign providers of energy.

ESADE

ESADE

<< Back to home

Why mandatory networks are far from conflict-free

09/2017

Power dependencies vary depending on whether networks regulate energy or telecommunications markets


Governance today often surpasses national borders. Regulatory networks and their Network Administrative Organizations (NAOs) come into play when policies can neither be solely covered by national governments nor delegated to European institutions. These regulatory networks cover specific legislation 'gaps' and their mission is to coordinate and reach consensus among the different countries involved.


Angel Saz-Carranza, Director of ESADEgeo and Associate Professor of Strategy, and his research colleagues took an in-depth look at how these networks are organized in the latest issue of Public Administration Review. Their research findings illustrate the power struggles that these regulatory networks face and explain why some are more vulnerable to external influences than others.


The team conducted in-depth interviews with managers and directors of Network Administrative Organizations, European Commission officials and other key staff from national regulatory authorities. The report compared how these networks are structured and how their power dependencies increase or decrease based on whether they address energy or telecommunications matters.


In some of these networks, participation as a member is optional, whereas in others is mandatory. "A main finding of our research is that networks that are not voluntary and require mandatory participation by European regulations are far from conflict-free," says Saz-Carranza. "In mandatory networks, we observed that political tension increases and members struggle to try to exert an influence on the inception and development of the network."


Bargaining power and most contested issues


How does bargaining power affect the development of mandated regulatory networks? "Our results suggest that the inception, design and development of mandated networks are affected by the power dynamics between 1) network members, 2) network members and key stakeholders in their domestic policy regime, and 3) the whole network and its domain."


The study also takes a close look at the key issues that members contest most strongly during the initial definition and inception stages of mandated networks.


"We found that the most disputed issues are the network's executive control, the network's size, and the network-level tasks and overall responsibilities."


Network vulnerability


Why are some networks more vulnerable to external influences than others? The Director of ESADEgeo and his research team argue that the degree of the network's external dependence varies depending on whether it operates in the energy or telecom sector. "Energy is potentially a more sensitive issue than telecoms, so it tends to have more political interferences," explains Saz-Carranza.


"Unlike their telecom counterparts, we found that energy networks are more integrated precisely because their members are more vulnerable to political interference from governments and large energy companies."


According to the report, this greater dependency on third parties may be attributable to Europe's energy dependence or - as one interviewee put it bluntly - the 'Russia factor', referring to Europe's dependence on a few foreign providers of energy.


The power dynamics of mandated network administrative organizations
Saz Carranza, Angel; Salvador Iborra, Susanna; Albareda Sanz, Adrià
Public Administration Review
Vol. 76, nº 3, 05/2016, p. 449 - 462
<< Back to home